Non-State Actors

Assessing the South Sudan Stability

January 13, 2020

Eren Ersozoglu


 

 

Key Judgements

 

KJ-1. It is likely that 15th February 2020 deadline will be missed based on evidence and previous deadline being missed. There are aggreviances and tensions on both sides that complicate the possibility of the deadline being met

 

KJ-2. If unity government formation is reached it does not solve the practical problems of forming a unified military of fighting factions and policing rural conflicts among heavily armed community

 

KJ-3. US and external pressure highly likely to encourage peace deal. Rising tensions amid an impending famine, broken economy and oil business all can be fuel for re-escalation of conflict due to propaganda and discontent. 

 

 

Analysis

 

South Sudan is on the verge of potentially ending a six year conflict. The political will and resources is significantly low to meet this goal. There is a February 15th, 2020,  deadline to reach an agreement. Past deadlines have been missed which brings skepticism on the current state of affairs. The face to face meeting of Riek Machar and President Salva Kiir is a positive development, but does not provide practical solutions, this was more of a symbolic occasion. 

 

 

A broken economy and an impending severe famine will be disastrous if a solution is not reached soon. The famine and economy would destabilise South Sudan further, causing increased violence and instability as conditions worsen. A collapsed South Sudan with a refugee influx would also destabilise surrounding nations and threatens regional security. Due to this, the US has increased pressure and sanctions on opposers of the peace agreement in an attempt to insure a peaceful solution.

 

 

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)

 

 

 

 

Forecast

 

If an agreement is reached, to exist as a state, a unified government must be able to have a state monopoly on violence to have credibility. South Sudan faces significant problems in the case. 

 

  • Unifying the fighting factions under a coherent structure will be problematic

 

  • The government lacks the resources to make this possible

 

  • Their is a lack of political will to unify among many

 

  • Ethnic tensions will not be solved completely by unified government

 

  • The rural fighting is among heavily armed factions, which will be problematic disarming

 

Failure to reach the deadline which is likely will encourage doubts among existing pessimists and disillusion others. Another extension carries the risk of a reverse of the ceasefire and instead further complicate the issue by factions losing faith in leadership and creating a network of fighting factions, further complicating any solution.

 

 

 

South Sudan: Conflict Map

 

 

 

Download ‘Assessing the South Sudan Stability’ in PDF

 

 

 

 


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Grey Dynamics LTD.

Related Post