Born from Lockheed Martin’s legendary Skunk Works, the Vectis Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) represents the next leap in stealth, autonomy, and distributed airpower. As the U.S. Air Force (USAF) reshapes its force structure for great power competition, Vectis stands at the edge of this transformation. It is a quiet spearhead for contested skies over the Pacific. 

This piece explores how the Vectis fits into the USAF’s evolving drone ecosystem, its role in countering China’s expanding Anti-Access / Aerial Denial (A2/AD) envelope, and what its emergence signals about the future of unmanned warfare.

1.0 Introduction 

1.1 What is Vectis?

The Vectis (Group 5 Collaborative Combat Aircraft) from Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works division appeared on 21 September 2025. This was a rare reveal from one of the defense industry’s most secretive units. Designed as a “survivable, lethal and reusable” unmanned aircraft, Vectis is pitched to partner with — or operate ahead of — manned fighters. 

Vectis is built into the “Family of Systems” vision for future air dominance. The UAV design prompts flexibility. Missions from precision strike and ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) to electronic warfare and offensive/defensive counter-air are all in scope. Its open systems design means payloads and mission systems can be swapped or upgraded. Additionally, advanced manufacturing and digital engineering are leveraged to keep cost and production timeline competitive. 

Although still in development, Skunk Works says prototype parts are on order and that a first flight will happen by around 2027.  The platform is a “lever” (which is the English translation of its Latin name) for future air-power. Thus it is intended to extend reach, survive in high-threat environments and enable new operational concepts for the US and allied air arms.

1.2 What does it look like?

[image source]

1.3 Specs and Capabilities

One of our sources in the US aerospace industry, in response to the question of specifications, writes to Grey Dynamics: “Specific range and endurance metrics remain undisclosed. However, Vectis should be operationally compatible with Indo-Pacific mission sets. That means endurance, payload, and logistics profiles aligned with operations across extended maritime distances, ship and shore basing, and interoperability with allied and partner force structures. There is a possibility of refueling with unmanned/manned systems.”

A general profile based on available information would include:

• Type: Group 5 Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA)
• Role: Strike, ISR, electronic warfare, offensive/defensive counter‑air
• Survivability: Stealth design, advanced materials, low-observable shaping
• Architecture: Open systems, modular payloads, government reference‑aligned
• Integration: Works with 5th‑gen fighters in “family of systems”
• Endurance/Range: Theater-capable (Indo‑Pacific, EUCOM, CENTCOM)
• Size: ~10–12 m length; smaller than F‑16, heavier than drone missiles
• Speed: Subsonic
• Development Status: Prototype parts ordered; first flight by ~2027
• Cost/Production: Digital engineering, scalable manufacturing for affordability

[source, source]

2.0 Vectis in the US Security Ecosystem

2.1 Vectis in the China-US Strategic Competition Context

The US-China strategic competition includes technological competition. Therefore this spills over into the production and development of geostrategically critical technologies such as UAV and loyal wingman vessels. Vectis is a direct participant in this competition. Similarly to the Chinese initiatives Sharp Sword and Dark Sword, it revolutionizes airspace battle doctrines, defense, and the very nature of the Chinese A2 / AD doctrine. 

According to a source within a major aerospace US manufacturer who wishes to remain anonymous: 

“The United States cannot realistically match the People’s Republic of China in pure production volume for unmanned systems. Their industrial model prizes scale; ours must prize asymmetry. Thus the competitive axis is technological advantage combined with manufacturability at useful scale and on operationally relevant timelines. To compete, we need modular, multi-use platforms that deliver decisive capability per unit rather than parity by numbers alone.

“Vectis embodies that approach. Rather than a single-mission air vehicle, it is a configurable architecture. Essentialy it’s an airframe built for rapid payload swaps and role reassignment. In practice this means one common logistics and software baseline can support ISR, strike, electronic warfare, decoying, and autonomous teaming roles by changing payload modules and software suites. Modularity reduces lifecycle cost, shortens time-to-field for new capabilities, and increases force-generation flexibility in a crisis.”

2.2 In the Pacific Theater

Further speaking to Vectis’s appropriateness for the Pacific theater reveals, our source notes:

“Vectis is optimized for contested airspaces — with particular emphasis on Indo-Pacific theaters. There geography, maritime basing constraints, and long-range sensing architectures create unique challenges. Its design philosophy prioritizes low observable characteristics and sensor survivability. A combination of airframe shaping, materials, and integrated systems reduce detectability and improve mission persistence against layered air-defense networks. This is a high-level capability description. Therefore detailed signature-management techniques and specific counter-detection methods remain controlled and I do not discuss here.

“Vectis will intentionally operate from non-standard, compromised, or improvised airfields. This dispersal capability is a deliberate force-protection and operational-resilience choice. By reducing dependence on established airbases, the platform preserves option-rich deployment across maritime and littoral environments. Furthermore it complicates adversary targeting campaigns. From a systems perspective, that drives requirements for accelerated turn-around, simplified ground-support interfaces, and robust communications for distributed command and control.” 

2.3 Vectis Integration in the USAF

The USAF is moving aggressively toward a force‑structure model in which uncrewed platforms do not simply fill gaps. Instead they become integrated “teammates” alongside manned aircraft. The emerging Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) initiative envisions hundreds, potentially thousands, of these autonomous or semi‑autonomous systems flying with fighters like the F‑35 Lightning II and the forthcoming sixth‑generation jets. Vectis slots into this architecture as the unmanned equivalent of a high‑end fighter’s wingman. Stealthy, networked, sensorfused, and designed to support, it can enhance and occasionally take risk in contested airspace.

Additionally, Vectis’s integration works around interoperability, upgradeability and operational adaptability. The USAF will leverage it not just as a bolt‑on asset but as part of a distributed air‑dominance network: flying ahead or alongside crewed assets, taking up ISR tasks, forwarding targeting data, executing decoys or strikes, and helping the manned platforms see, shoot and survive in the increasingly dense Indo‑Pacific battlespace. By fitting into the CCA framework already under development, Vectis becomes a real expression of the USAF’s shift toward crewed‑uncrewed teaming and credible mass in future aerial combat.

Furthermore our source writes: “Think of Vectis as the F-35 philosophy applied to unmanned platforms: an anticipatory, multi-role system integrating survivability, sensor fusion, and networked effects in a single, upgradeable design. Importantly, Vectis was not born from a single externally imposed requirement but from an internal, forward-looking systems vision — an attempt to anticipate the convergent demands of autonomy, contested logistics, and multi-domain integration in the very near future.”

[source, source, source, source]

2.4 Operational Concept for Vectis

Vectis would typically operate as a stealthy, networked teammate that pushes forward of crewed jets to sense, degrade, and, when needed, absorb risk — scouting for threats, performing stand‑in electronic‑attack or decoy roles, and handing refined targeting data back to F‑35s or command nodes for precision strikes.

Thus, it fly paired or in small‑pack formations to create tactical mass at lower cost. The idea? One Vectis loiters as a sensor node while others prosecute targets or spoof enemy radars, enabling distributed kill chains and attritable effects in high‑threat littoral and archipelagic environments. Its autonomy and open‑architecture payload bays let mission planners swap sensor, EW or strike packages mid‑campaign, while the USAF’s push for dedicated CCA squadrons and doctrine means Vectis could both augment existing fighter wings and operate in independent unmanned formations under human oversight.

In short: Vectis is built to see farther, act faster, and be expendable in places where sending a pilot would be strategically costly. Effectively it can act as a force‑multiplier for contested Indo‑Pacific operations rather than a like‑for‑like replacement for crewed fighters.

[source, source]

3.0 Conclusion 

Vectis represents more than just a new UAV. It embodies a strategic shift in how the USAF approaches contested airspaces, autonomy, and multi-domain integration. As a modular, survivable, and networked platform, it extends the reach of manned fighters, enables distributed airpower, and allows the U.S. to compete asymmetrically with China in the Indo-Pacific. 

Understanding Vectis is crucial because it illustrates the convergence of advanced stealth, sensor fusion, and operational flexibility in a single, upgradeable system. Vectis is a tangible example of how unmanned platforms are no longer secondary assets but central elements in shaping the future of air combat and U.S. strategic advantage. It also highlights the need for production flexibility; to compete along the lines of quality not quantity, against an adversary with advanced scaling capabilities.