EU-Egypt Agreement: New Prospects for Migration Control?

The EU-Egypt agreement on migration represents yet another attempt from the European Union to curb migration. However, rather than addressing the roots of migration, it adopts a securitisation perspective. The lack of a comprehensive approach to migration is likely to undermine the new agreement. Similarly, it could foster the disregard of human rights. Moreover, it is likely that this agreement is part of a broader EU strategy to relocate it’s supply chains. By containing migration in Egypt, the EU ensures a local workforce. This is necessary to sustain EU-based companies’ supply and production lines.

Key Judgement 1. The recent EU-Egypt agreement on migration is unlikely to diminish the overall migration flows in Europe over the next two years.

Key Judgement 2. It is unlikely that implementing the agreement will improve migrants’ human rights in the next two years.

Key Judgement 3. This agreement is likely to be part of a wide E.U. strategy of nearshoring and regional connectivity in the next 24 months.

Rest of this post is for paying members only

Already have an account?  Log in

Secret Plan
£14.99
/ month
Recommended
Top Secret Plan
£39.99
/ month
Secret Plan
£14.99
/ month
Recommended
Top Secret Plan
£39.99
/ month
Already a member? Log in here

Zélie Petit

Junior Intelligence Analyst
Table of Contents

Related Content

Top secret

DNA Identification: Implications for SF Operators and Spies

Washington Versus Caracas: Assessing Venezuela’s Military Defences

Location:_ Latin America
Secret

International Criminal Court Under Pressure: What’s next?

Location:_ Europe

Stay in the loop

Get a free weekly email that makes reading
intel articles and reports actually enjoyable.

Table of Contents

Log in

Stay in the loop

Join thousands of people receiving monthly reports on history alternating events that affect their business, investments and personal life.

Contact

Contact

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.