Arctic Forecast 2026: Russia 

Executive Summary

The Arctic was once a region of collaboration, scientific research, and cooperative engagement, even as tensions and conflicts unfolded elsewhere. Since 2022, the Arctic has rapidly emerged as a central arena of geopolitical competition with a rising risk of future flashpoints. It is continuing to evolve, shaped by emerging actors, shifting dynamics, and accelerating environmental change, making 2026 likely to be another important year for the region. Russia, with roughly half of the Arctic coastline along its shores, is deeply embedded in this arena, and its future activities are set to play a major role in shaping the trajectory of the Arctic.

We assess as highly likely Russia’s increase in both the scale and complexity of its hybrid warfare campaigns against other Arctic players, as well as the further intensification of Russian Arctic militarisation in 2026. Furthermore, Moscow is highly likely to further prioritise and tighten its de facto sovereignty over the Northern Sea Route (NSR). Additionally, Russia’s 2026 Arctic foreign policy will likely aim to develop alternative bilateral partnerships outside the West, particularly with China. That said, diverging interests within the Sino-Russian relationship are likely to limit some aspects of cooperation with Beijing. 

Rest of this post is for members only

Already have an account?  Log in

6 Months
£1500
12 months
£3000
Already a member? Log in here

Ivy Shields

Table of Contents

Related Content

Locked

Arctic Forecast 2026: Sweden

Location:_ Europe, Arctic
Locked

Arctic Forecast 2026: Canada

Location:_ Arctic

Holding Taiwan: China’s Air Power Limitations Post-Invasion 

Stay in the loop

Get a free weekly email that makes reading
intel articles and reports actually enjoyable.

Table of Contents

Log in

Stay in the loop

Join thousands of people receiving ground truth based reports that affect their business, investments and personal life.

Contact

Contact

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.