Chinese Espionage Against Russia: Implications (2025 – 2030) 

Executive Summary

We assess that China is intensifying espionage efforts against Russia, a trend that will likely continue over the next 5 years. A leaked Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) document reportedly designates China as “the enemy,” reflecting Moscow’s concern that its focus on Ukraine has created vulnerabilities for foreign intelligence penetration. This raises questions about the durability of the Sino-Russian relationship and the implications of China’s activities. We assess that, despite the strain espionage places on the relationship, it is unlikely to significantly weaken the broader partnership, as both sides continue to benefit strategically and economically. In fact, we assess that China is likely to expand its strategic and economic footprint in Russia. This is particularly in the Far East and Arctic, where Moscow’s capacity to resist external influence remains limited. 

Images Sourced From: Office of the President of Russia, Kremlin.ru, Presidential Executive Office of Russia, Russian government

Rest of this post is for paying members only

Already have an account?  Log in

Secret Plan
£14.99
/ month
Recommended
Top Secret Plan
£39.99
/ month
Secret Plan
£14.99
/ month
Recommended
Top Secret Plan
£39.99
/ month
Already a member? Log in here

Ivy Shields

Table of Contents

Related Content

Secret

International Criminal Court Under Pressure: What’s next?

Location:_ Europe
Secret

Russian Influence Operations: AI and Institution Mimicking

Location:_ Eurasia
Top secret

Sean Cairncross: New U.S. National Cyber Director, Loyalty Over Expertise

Location:_ North America

Stay in the loop

Get a free weekly email that makes reading
intel articles and reports actually enjoyable.

Table of Contents

Log in

Stay in the loop

Join thousands of people receiving monthly reports on history alternating events that affect their business, investments and personal life.

Contact

Contact

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.